It is a great honour for me to
be here today. I would like to talk to the General
Assembly about a subject that is at the heart of the
United Nations — the pursuit of peace in an imperfect
world.
War and conflict have been with us since the
beginning of civilization. But in the first part of the
twentieth century, the advance of modern weaponry led
to death on a staggering scale. It was that killing that
11-50692 10
compelled the founders of this body to build an
institution that was focused not just on ending one war,
but on averting others; a union of sovereign States that
would seek to prevent conflict while also addressing its
causes.
No American did more to pursue that objective
than President Franklin Roosevelt. He knew that a
victory in war was not enough. As he said at one of the
very first meetings on the founding of the United
Nations, “We have got to make not merely peace, but a
peace that will last”.
The men and women who built this institution
understood that peace is more than the absence of war.
A lasting peace — for nations and individuals —
depends upon a sense of justice and opportunity; of
dignity and freedom. It depends upon struggle and
sacrifice; on compromise and on a sense of common
humanity.
One delegate to the San Francisco Conference,
which led to the creation of the United Nations, put it
well:
“Many people have talked as if all we had to do
to get peace was to say loudly and frequently that
we loved peace and hated war. Now we have
learned that no matter how much we love peace
and hate war, we cannot avoid having war
brought upon us if there are convulsions in other
parts of the world”.
The fact is, peace is hard, but our people demand
it. Over nearly seven decades, even as the United
Nations helped avert a third world war, we still live in
a world scarred by conflict and plagued by poverty.
Even as we proclaim our love for peace and hatred of
war, there are still convulsions in our world that
endanger us all.
I took office at a time of two wars for the United
States. Moreover, the violent extremists who drew us
into war in the first place — Osama bin Laden and his
Al-Qaida organization — remained at large. Today, we
have set a new direction.
At the end of this year, America’s military
operation in Iraq will be over. We will have a normal
relationship with a sovereign nation that is a member
of the community of nations. That equal partnership
will be strengthened by our support for Iraq — for its
Government and its security forces, for its people and
their aspirations.
As we end the war in Iraq, the United States and
our coalition partners have begun a transition in
Afghanistan. Between now and 2014, an increasingly
capable Afghan Government and security forces will
step forward to take responsibility for the future of
their country. As they do, we are drawing down our
own forces, while building an enduring partnership
with the Afghan people.
So let there be no doubt: the tide of war is
receding. When I took office, roughly 180,000 Americans
were serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. By the end of
this year, that number will be cut in half, and it will
continue to decline. This is critical for the sovereignty
of Iraq and Afghanistan, and to the strength of the
United States as we build our nation at home.
Moreover, we are poised to end these wars from a
position of strength. Ten years ago, there was an open
wound and twisted steel; a broken heart in the centre of
this city. Today, as a new tower is rising at Ground
Zero, it symbolizes New York’s renewal, even as
Al-Qaida is under more pressure than ever before. Its
leadership has been degraded. Osama bin Laden, a man
who murdered thousands of people from dozens of
countries, will never endanger the peace of the world
again.
Yes, this has been a difficult decade. But today
we stand at a crossroads of history, with the chance to
move decisively in the direction of peace. To do so we
must return to the wisdom of those who created this
institution.
The founding Charter of United Nations calls
upon us, to unite our strength to maintain international
peace and security. Article 1 of the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights reminds us that, “All
human beings are born free and equal in dignity and in
rights”. Those bedrock beliefs — in the responsibility
of States and the rights of men and women — must be
our guide.
In that effort, we have reason to hope. This year
has been a time of extraordinary transformation. More
nations have stepped forward to maintain international
peace and security. More individuals are claiming their
universal right to live in freedom and dignity.
Think about it. One year ago, when we met here
in New York, the prospect of a successful referendum
in South Sudan was in doubt. But the international
community overcame old divisions to support the
11 11-50692
agreement that had been negotiated to give South
Sudan self-determination. Last summer, as a new flag
went up in Juba, former soldiers laid down their arms,
men and women wept with joy and children finally
knew the promise of looking to a future that they will
shape.
One year ago, the people of Côte d’Ivoire
approached a landmark election. When the incumbent
lost and refused to respect the results, the world
refused to look the other way. United Nations
peacekeepers were harassed, but they did not leave
their posts. The Security Council, led by the United
States, Nigeria and France, came together to support
the will of the people. Côte d’Ivoire is now governed
by the man who was elected to lead.
One year ago, the hopes of the people of Tunisia
were suppressed. But they chose the dignity of
peaceful protest over the rule of an iron fist. A vendor
lit a spark that took his own life, but ignited a
movement. In the face of a crackdown, students spelled
out the word freedom. The balance of fear shifted from
the ruler to those whom he ruled. Now the people of
Tunisia are preparing for elections that will move them
one step closer to the democracy that they deserve.
One year ago, Egypt had known one President for
nearly 30 years. But for 18 days, the eyes of the world
were glued to Tahrir Square, where Egyptians from all
walks of life — men and women, young and old,
Muslim and Christian — demanded their universal
rights. We saw in those protesters the moral force of
non-violence that has lit the world from Delhi to
Warsaw, from Selma to South Africa — and we knew
that change had come to Egypt and to the Arab world.
One year ago, the people of Libya were ruled by
the world’s longest-serving dictator. But faced with
bullets and bombs and a dictator who threatened to
hunt them down like rats, they showed relentless
bravery. We will never forget the words of the Libyan
who stood up in those early days of the revolution and
said, “Our words are free now”. It is a feeling one
cannot explain. Day after day, in the face of bullets and
bombs, the Libyan people refused to give back that
freedom. And when they were threatened by the kind
of mass atrocity that often went unchallenged in the
past century, the United Nations lived up to its Charter.
The Security Council authorized all necessary
measures to prevent a massacre. The Arab League
called for that effort. Arab nations joined a NATO-led
coalition that halted Al-Qadhafi’s forces in their tracks.
In the months that followed, the will of the
coalition proved unbreakable, and the will of the
Libyan people could not be denied. Forty-two years of
tyranny were ended in six months. From Tripoli to
Misurata to Benghazi — today, Libya is free.
Yesterday, the leaders of a new Libya took their
rightful place beside us, and this week the United
States is reopening our embassy in Tripoli.
This is how the international community is
supposed to work — nations standing together for the
sake of peace and security, and individuals claiming
their rights. Now, all of us have a responsibility to
support the new Libya and the new Libyan
Government as they confront the challenge of turning
this moment of promise into a just and lasting peace
for all Libyans.
So this has been a remarkable year. The
Al-Qadhafi regime is over. Gbagbo, Ben Ali and
Mubarak are no longer in power. Osama bin Laden is
gone, and the idea that change could come only
through violence has been buried with him. Something
is happening in our world. The way things have been is
not the way that they will be. The humiliating grip of
corruption and tyranny is being pried open. Dictators
are on notice. Technology is putting power into the
hands of the people. Youth are delivering a powerful
rebuke to dictatorship and rejecting the lie that some
races, some peoples, some religions and some
ethnicities do not desire democracy. The promise
written down on paper — “all human beings are born
free and equal in dignity and rights” — is closer at
hand.
But let us remember: Peace is hard. Peace is hard.
Progress can be reversed. Prosperity comes slowly.
Societies can split apart. The measure of our success
must be whether people can live in sustained freedom,
dignity and security. And the United Nations and its
Member States must do their part to support those
basic aspirations. And we have more work to do.
In Iran, we have seen a Government that refuses
to recognize the rights of its own people. As we meet
here today, men, women and children are being
tortured, detained and murdered by the Syrian regime.
Thousands have been killed, many during the holy time
of Ramadan. Thousands more have poured across
Syria’s borders. The Syrian people have shown dignity
11-50692 12
and courage in their pursuit of justice, protesting
peacefully, standing silently in the streets and dying for
the same values that this institution is supposed to
stand for. And the question for us is clear: Will we
stand with the Syrian people or with their oppressors?
Already, the United States has imposed strong
sanctions on Syria’s leaders. We supported a transfer of
power that would be responsive to the Syrian people.
And many of our allies have joined in this effort. But
for the sake of Syria — and the peace and security of
the world — we must speak with one voice. There is
no excuse for inaction. Now is the time for the Security
Council to sanction the Syrian regime and to stand with
the Syrian people.
Throughout the region, we will have to respond
to the calls for change. In Yemen, men, women and
children gather by the thousands in towns and city
squares every day with the hope that their
determination and spilled blood will prevail over a
corrupt system. America supports those aspirations. We
must work with Yemen’s neighbours and our partners
around the world to seek a path that allows for a
peaceful transition of power from President Saleh, and
a movement to free and fair elections as soon as
possible.
In Bahrain, steps have been taken towards reform
and accountability. We are pleased with that, but more
is required. America is a close friend of Bahrain, and
we will continue to call on the Government and the
main opposition bloc — al-Wifaq — to pursue a
meaningful dialogue that brings peaceful change that is
responsive to the people. We believe the patriotism that
binds Bahrainis together must be more powerful than
the sectarian forces that would tear them apart. It will
be hard, but it is possible.
We believe that each nation must chart its own
course to fulfil the aspirations of its people. America
does not expect to agree with every party or person
who expresses themselves politically, but we will
always stand up for the universal rights that were
embraced by this Assembly. Those rights depend on
elections that are free and fair, governance that is
transparent and accountable, respect for the rights of
women and minorities, and justice that is equal and
fair. That is what our people deserve. Those are the
elements of peace that can last.
Moreover, the United States will continue to
support, with greater trade and investment, those
nations that transition to democracy, so that freedom is
followed by opportunity. We will pursue deeper
engagement with Governments, but also with civil
society — students and entrepreneurs, political parties
and the press. We have banned those who abuse human
rights from travelling to our country and we have
sanctioned those who trample on human rights abroad.
And we will always serve as a voice for those who
have been silenced.
Now, I know, particularly this week, that for
many in this Hall, there is one issue that stands as a test
of these principles and a test of American foreign
policy, and that is the conflict between the Israelis and
the Palestinians.
One year ago, I stood at this podium and I called
for an independent Palestine. I believed then, and I
believe now, that the Palestinian people deserve a State
of their own, but what I also said is that a genuine
peace can be realized only between the Israelis and the
Palestinians themselves. One year later, despite
extensive efforts by America and others, the parties
have not bridged their differences. Faced with this
stalemate, I put forward a new basis for negotiations in
May of this year. That basis is clear. It is well known to
all of us here. Israelis must know that any agreement
provides assurances for their security. Palestinians
deserve to know the territorial basis of their State.
I know that many are frustrated by the lack of
progress; I assure them that I am too. But the question
is not the goal that we seek. The question is: How do
we reach that goal? And I am convinced that there is no
shortcut to the end of a conflict that has endured for
decades. Peace is hard work. Peace will not come
through statements and resolutions at the United
Nations. If it were that easy, it would have been
accomplished by now. Ultimately, it is the Israelis and
the Palestinians who must live side by side. Ultimately,
it is the Israelis and the Palestinians — not us — who
must reach agreement on the issues that divide them:
on borders and on security, on refugees and on
Jerusalem.
Ultimately, peace depends upon compromise
among people who must live together long after our
speeches are over, long after our votes have been
tallied. That is the lesson of Northern Ireland, where
ancient antagonists bridged their differences. That is
the lesson of the Sudan, where a negotiated settlement
led to an independent State. And that is and will be the
13 11-50692
path to a Palestinian State — negotiations between the
parties.
We seek a future where Palestinians live in a
sovereign State of their own, with no limit to what they
can achieve. There is no question that the Palestinians
have seen that vision delayed for too long. It is
precisely because we believe so strongly in the
aspirations of the Palestinian people that America has
invested so much time and so much effort in the
building of a Palestinian State and in the negotiations
that can deliver a Palestinian State.
But understand this as well: America’s
commitment to Israel’s security is unshakeable. Our
friendship with Israel is deep and enduring. And so we
believe that any lasting peace must acknowledge the
very real security concerns that Israel faces every
single day.
Let us be honest with ourselves: Israel is
surrounded by neighbours that have waged repeated
wars against it. Israel’s citizens have been killed by
rockets fired at their houses and suicide bombs on their
buses. Israel’s children come of age knowing that
throughout the region other children are taught to hate
them. Israel, a small country of less than 8 million
people, looks out at a world where leaders of much
larger nations threaten to wipe it off of the map. The
Jewish people carry the burden of centuries of exile
and persecution and fresh memories of knowing that
6 million people were killed simply because of who
they are. Those are facts. They cannot be denied.
The Jewish people have forged a successful State
in their historic homeland. Israel deserves recognition.
It deserves normal relations with its neighbours. And
friends of the Palestinians do them no favours by
ignoring that truth, just as friends of Israel must
recognize the need to pursue a two-State solution with
a secure Israel next to an independent Palestine.
That is the truth. Each side has legitimate
aspirations, and that is part of what makes peace so
hard. And the deadlock will be broken only when each
side learns to stand in the other’s shoes and each side
can see the world through the other’s eyes. That is
what we should be encouraging. That is what we
should be promoting.
This body — founded as it was out of the ashes
of war and genocide, and dedicated as it is to the
dignity of every single person — must recognize the
reality that is lived by the Palestinians and the Israelis
alike. The measure of our actions must always be
whether they advance the right of Israeli and
Palestinian children to live lives of peace and security
and dignity and opportunity. And we will succeed in
that effort only if we can encourage the parties to sit
down, to listen to each other and to understand each
other’s hopes and each other’s fears. That is the project
to which America is committed. There are no shortcuts.
And that is what the United Nations should be focused
on in the weeks and months to come.
Even as we confront these challenges of conflict
and revolution, we must also recognize — and we must
also remind ourselves — that peace is not just the
absence of war. True peace depends on creating the
opportunity that makes life worth living. And to do
that, we must confront the common enemies of
humanity: nuclear weapons and poverty, ignorance and
disease. Those forces corrode the possibility of lasting
peace and together we are called upon to confront
them.
To lift the spectre of mass destruction, we must
come together to pursue the peace and security of a
world without nuclear weapons. Over the past two
years, we have begun to walk down that path. Since
our Nuclear Security Summit in Washington, D.C.,
nearly 50 nations have taken steps to secure nuclear
materials from terrorists and smugglers. Next March, a
summit in Seoul will advance our efforts to lock down
all of them. The New START Treaty between the
United States and Russia will cut our deployed arsenals
to the lowest level in half a century, and our nations are
pursuing talks on how to achieve even deeper
reductions. America will continue to work for a ban on
the testing of nuclear weapons and the production of
fissile material needed to make them.
And so we have begun to move in the right
direction. And the United States is committed to
meeting our obligations. But even as we meet our
obligations, we have strengthened the treaties and
institutions that help stop the spread of those weapons.
And to do so, we must continue to hold accountable
those nations that flout them.
The Iranian Government cannot demonstrate that
its programme is peaceful. It has not met its obligations
and it rejects offers that would provide it with peaceful
nuclear power. North Korea has yet to take concrete
steps towards abandoning its weapons and continues
11-50692 14
belligerent action against the South. There is a future
of greater opportunity for the people of those nations if
their Governments meet their international obligations.
But if they continue down a path that is outside
international law, they must be met with greater
pressure and isolation. That is what our commitment to
peace and security demands.
To bring prosperity to our people, we must
promote the growth that creates opportunity. In this
effort, let us not forget that we have made enormous
progress over the past several decades. Closed societies
gave way to open markets. Innovation and
entrepreneurship have transformed the way we live and
the things that we do. Emerging economies from Asia
to the Americas have lifted hundreds of millions of
people from poverty. It is an extraordinary
achievement.
And yet, three years ago, we were confronted
with the worst financial crisis in eight decades. And
that crisis proved a fact that has become clearer with
each passing year. Our fates are interconnected. In a
global economy, nations will rise or fall together.
Today, we confront the challenges that have
followed on the heels of that crisis. Around the world
recovery is still fragile. Markets remain volatile. Too
many people are out of work. Too many others are
struggling just to get by. We acted together to avert a
depression in 2009. We must take urgent and
coordinated action once more.
Here in the United States, I have announced a
plan to put Americans back to work and jump-start our
economy, at the same time as I am committed to
substantially reducing our deficits over time.
We stand with our European allies as they
reshape their institutions and address their own fiscal
challenges. For other countries, leaders face a different
challenge as they shift their economy towards more
self-reliance, boosting domestic demand while slowing
inflation. So we will work with emerging economies
that have rebounded strongly so that rising standards of
living create new markets that promote global growth.
That is what our commitment to prosperity demands.
To combat the poverty that punishes our children,
we must act on the belief that freedom from want is a
basic human right. The United States has made it a
focus of our engagement abroad to help people to feed
themselves. And today, as drought and conflict have
brought famine to the Horn of Africa, our conscience
calls on us to act. Together, we must continue to
provide assistance and support organizations that can
reach those in need. And together, we must insist on
unrestricted humanitarian access so that we can save
the lives of thousands of men and women and children.
Our common humanity is at stake. Let us show that the
life of a child in Somalia is as precious as any other.
That is what our commitment to our fellow human
beings demands.
To stop disease that spreads across borders, we
must strengthen our system of public health. We will
continue the fight against HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and
malaria. We will focus on the health of mothers and of
children. And we must come together to prevent and
detect and fight every kind of biological danger —
whether it is a pandemic like H1N1 or a terrorist threat
or a treatable disease.
This week, America signed an agreement with the
World Health Organization (WHO) to affirm our
commitment to meeting that challenge. And today, I
urge all nations to join us in meeting the WHO goal of
making sure all nations have core capacities to address
public health emergencies in place by 2012. That is
what our commitment to the health of our people
demands.
To preserve our planet, we must not put off action
that climate change demands. We have to tap the power
of science to save those resources that are scarce. And
together, we must continue our work to build on the
progress made in Copenhagen and Cancún, so that all
the major economies represented here today follow
through on the commitments that were made. Together,
we must work to transform the energy that powers our
economies and support others as they move down that
path. That is what our commitment to the next
generation demands.
To make sure our societies reach their potential,
we must allow our citizens to reach theirs. No country
can afford the corruption that plagues the world like a
cancer. Together, we must harness the power of open
societies and open economies. That is why we have
partnered with countries across the globe to launch a
new partnership on open Government that helps ensure
accountability and helps to empower citizens. No
country should deny people their rights to freedom of
speech and freedom of religion, but also no country
should deny people their rights because of whom they
15 11-50692
love, which is why we must stand up for the rights of
gays and lesbians everywhere.
No country can realize its potential if half its
population cannot reach theirs. This week, the United
States signed a new declaration on women’s
participation. Next year, we should each announce the
steps we are taking to break down the economic and
political barriers that stand in the way of women and
girls. That is what our commitment to human progress
demands.
I know there is no straight line to that progress,
no single path to success. We come from different
cultures, and carry with us different histories. But let
us never forget that even as we gather here as Heads of
different Governments, we represent citizens who share
the same basic aspirations to live with dignity and
freedom, to get an education and pursue opportunity, to
love our families and love and worship our God, to live
in the kind of peace that makes life worth living.
It is the nature of our imperfect world that we are
forced to learn these lessons over and over again.
Conflict and repression will endure so long as some
people refuse to do unto others as we would have them
do unto us. Yet that is precisely why we have built
institutions like this — to bind our fates together, to
help us recognize ourselves in each other — because
those who came before us believed that peace is
preferable to war, and freedom is preferable to
suppression, and prosperity is preferable to poverty.
That is the message that comes not from capitals, but
from citizens, from our people.
When the cornerstone of this very building was
put in place, President Truman came here to New York
and said, “The United Nations is essentially an
expression of the moral nature of man’s aspirations” —
the moral nature of man’s aspirations. As we live in a
world that is changing at a breathtaking pace, that is a
lesson that we must never forget.
Peace is hard, but we know that it is possible. So,
together, let us be resolved to see that it is defined by
our hopes and not by our fears. Together, let us make
peace — but a peace, most importantly, that will last.