Mr. President, may I first associate myself with
the congratulations extended to you on your
election as President of the General Assembly.
92. I am very pleased to have the honour once
again of addressing the General Assembly after an
interval of seven years. In an international
perspective, seven years is not a long time. Yet
in that interval, profound changes have imposed
themselves on the world community—changes that
have distanced us from the relatively optimistic
days of the mid-1970s.
93. Simply stated, the world at present is
facing acute economic and political crises. World
economic conditions have deteriorated sharply,
with devastating consequences on the aspirations
of all nations, rich and poor alike. Political
upheaval has driven the interna¬tional community
towards recurrent instability. And these forces
are closely linked. Political crises generate
economic consequences and economic dislocations
breed political instability.
94. How can we chart a course for our
institutions that will bring us through this
period of grave economic dislocation and
dangerous political tension and serve the
interests of all members of the General Assembly?
93. When our present institutions, such as the
United Nations, IMF, the World Bank and GATT,
first took shape, there was hope of maintaining a
network of relationships which would match the
complexity of post-war interdependence and help
us to stabilize it. Today, the need to manage
interdependence is even more pressing. But in the
present crisis there is a disturbing tendency to
discount and discredit multi¬lateral
institutions. Because the maze of international
problems has become more resistant to
conventional solutions, attacks are being made on
the institutions through which solutions are
being approached. The United Nations, in
particular, has been the object of much criticism.
96. We cannot fail to realize that
interdependence is a reality that we must accept,
for better or for worse, and that no nation can
hope to resolve its problems on its own.
Multilateralism, whatever its specific form, is
our primary hope for counteracting on a world
scale political and economic aggression which can
only too easily result from a long period of
uncertainty and fear.
97. However, let us have no illusions: the
credibility and the effectiveness of the
multilateral institutions depend on the political
will of nations and of their leaders, and on the
will to find a collective response to serious
national and international problems.
98. Most countries, developed and developing,
are now grappling with high rates of inflation.
Slow or stagnant growth and international
payments imbal¬ances compound already serious
debt problems. Record high unemployment in many
countries threatens the social and political
fabric of our societies and feeds protectionist
sentiment. At the international level, the
economic crisis is having a devastating effect on
growth prospects and on development assistance.
Debt-servicing problems have reached proportions
that impose considerable strain on the
international financial system.
99. The consequence has been an increasing
ten¬dency towards economic parochialism.
Pressures for short-term relief put at risk the
multilateral system and narrow the longer-term
prospects for all of us. These pressures must be
resisted.
100. The collective response to the current
economic situation was extensively discussed at
the annual meeting of IMF and the World Bank held
recently in Toronto. I was encouraged by the
determination of participants at that meeting to
treat economic problems as matters of common
concern requiring common action.
101. I should like to underline two important
themes. First, the magnitude of the financial
difficulties many of our countries face makes it
imperative that IMF should have adequate
resources to ensure that it can continue to play
its vital role in promoting adjustment in member
countries. That is why Canada supports a
substantial increase in quotas during the Eighth
General Review.
102. Secondly, the current economic situation has meant that
development assistance has become even more
essential for a number of developing countries
and it is important that bilateral and
multilateral flows continue. We welcomed the
agreement reached at Toronto to ensure an
adequate level of funding through the life of the
Sixth Replenishment of the International
Development Association (IDAVI).
103. The tendency to turn inward economically
is also exerting strain on the multilateral
trading system. Protectionist sentiment arising
from economic disloca¬tion is difficult for all
Governments to deal with, my own included. But it
is absolutely essential that we manage these
pressures collectively to avoid under¬mining
GATT. That organization has been enormously
beneficial in promoting world economic growth in
developed and developing countries. Any serious
weakening of GATT through beggar-thy-neighbour
policies would have the ultimate effect of making
beggars of us all. GATT can and should be
strengthened.
104. Canada will chair the 1982 annual session
of the GATT Contracting Parties, which will be
held at the ministerial level in November. We
regard this session as a significant test of our
collective determination to manage an
interdependent system.
105. Intense preoccupation with domestic
economic concerns also confounds our attempts to
persevere with development assistance programmes.
What should be our response to the inescapability
of shrinking resources? How do we face the
difficulties in generating increased development
assistance flows?
106. We should all—national donors and
multilateral agencies alike—rationalize
deployment of available resources for maximum
possible effect. The best results can be obtained
from this process of com¬pulsory selectivity only
if donors focus on areas of special national
expertise and resources. Canada has chosen to
concentrate its efforts in three particular areas
which draw upon considerable national experience.
These are the food and agricultural area, energy,
specifically petroleum exploration, and human
resources.
107. Another response to shrinking resources
should be to make full and timely use of every
opportunity for enhanced co operation. In this
connection, I am disappointed with the lack of
progress made on global negotiations since the
Versailles Economic Summit in June. Canada
believes that the text of a compromise resolution
worked out at Versailles represented a
significant step in the effort to find a formula
for launching global negotiations. I regret that
it has not been possible to find a basis for real
negotiations.
108. Economic problems are all the more vexing
and potentially dangerous because they are bound
up with serious political instability. Political
instability pro¬duces consequences extending far
beyond the imme¬diate region in which conflict
has erupted. In a shrinking world local
vulnerabilities and tragedies become the common
concern of us all.
109. We have witnessed the long agony of
Lebanon and, but 10 days ago, the horror of the
massacre of Palestinians. These terrible events
show us in stark fashion the price that must be
paid when one strives to resolve political
problems by military means, when disputes among
nations and peoples and political factions
replace negotiations, when one misuses or
disregards the instruments that the international
com¬munity has established to settle disputes and
prevent human suffering.
110. I should like to stress that Canada
staunchly supports the sovereignty, independence
and territorial integrity of Lebanon, and that it
endorses the Security Council resolutions which
call for Israel's withdrawal from west Beirut and
the whole of Lebanon. No foreign force should
remain in that country without the full consent
of the Lebanese Government; otherwise that
ravaged country will never know stability again.
111. Equally important, efforts must be
intensified now to grapple with the problems at
the heart of the Arab-Israeli conflict. More than
ever the tragic events of the last few months
illustrate the need for a just and permanent
solution which assures the legitimate rights of
the Palestinian people, including their right to
a homeland in the West Bank and Gaza, and the
right of Israel to exist in security and peace.
Important proposals for such a solution have
recently been made. The United States proposals
of 1 Sep¬tember in particular offer opportunities
for progress which should vigorously be pursued.
112. Other arenas of conflict continue to
contribute to the generally high level of
international tension. Events in Poland remain an
object of our particular attention, not only
because of concern for the basic rights and
freedoms of the Polish people but also because of
serious implications for stability in the heart
of Europe.
113. In Afghanistan and Cambodia we witness
agonizing, protracted and deplorable military
occupa¬tions which are in sharp contradiction
with the aims and ideals of the Organization and
the Charter. The Soviet occupation of Afghanistan
and the Vietnamese occupation of Cambodia
continue to violate the sovereignty of their
victims and to ignore resolutions adopted by the
General Assembly. Once again this year draft
resolutions are before the Assembly on
Afghanistan and Cambodia. I urge all Member
States to support these draft resolutions.
114. The Korean peninsula has long been an
area of tension and concern. We are encouraged
however by the proposals made in January this
year by the President of the Republic of Korea
seeking dialogue and reconciliation, without
conditions, and we hope for the greater
integration of the peninsula into the
inter¬national community.
115. The extent to which local or regional
conflicts draw their energy from mutually
antagonistic ideo¬logical systems is also cause
for considerable concern. In recent years the
breakdown of detente and an increasing anxiety
over the unpredictability of events have fuelled
public fears of nuclear war. Our peoples fear
that everything is at risk: the economic and
technological systems which sustain us, the
political and social systems which underpin them
and the very biosphere which permits the
existence of life itself.
116. The world had high hopes for the second
special session of the General Assembly on
disarmament. When the session ended and no final
agreement on a comprehensive programme of
disarmament had been reached, there was much
disappointment and frustra¬tion. However, a
disservice is done to the special session and to
the United Nations as an institution if it is
simply dismissed as a failure. Of course the
results were disappointing, but then the
expectations of many were probably
unrealistically high given the prevailing
international climate. Moreover, in this climate
it is essential that the campaign for nuclear
disarmament be waged at the negotiating table. My
country strongly supports the present
negotiations in Geneva to limit and reduce the
level of nuclear arms.
117. Canada has chosen to contribute to the
arms control and disarmament process by
concentrating on the vital issue of verification.
We are doing this through participating in the
international seismic data exchange and by
substantially increasing research in
verification. I would appeal to other Member
States to consider how their particular
circumstances and resources might be drawn upon
to contribute to the arms control process. It is
basically the same question as with development:
given the need for selectivity, what can you
contribute?
118. I have evoked today a set of perplexing
and interrelated economic and political problems.
What is the United Nations capacity to respond to
these? The question is an urgent one, because the
United Nations and the specialized agencies
address virtually the entire range of human
concerns.
119. Within the United Nations, crisis
management capacity has been called seriously
into question by divisions within the Security
Council, by erosion of the constitutional
division of authority between the Security
Council and the General Assembly and by a cycle
of ineffectual resolutions. We have seen an
increasing tendency to introduce extraneous
polemical issues in the specialized agencies,
with adiminution of their effectiveness and
credibility. Official spokes¬men of key States
Members of the United Nations have expressed
scepticism regarding the Organization. To counter
attacks on the United Nations from within and
without we must more closely bind our policies
and our behaviour to the principles expressed in
the Charter. We must also vigorously reaffirm the
singular contribution that the United Nations has
made to the development of international law. As
the Secretary-General explained at length and
with eloquence in a statement delivered last
month in Montreal, the United Nations plays a
unique and absolutely essential role in the
promotion of the rule of law. It is only the
United Nations, with its virtually global scope,
which has the capacity to play that role.
120. This year the Third United Nations
Conference on the Law of the Sea succeeded in
producing a profound achievement: a comprehensive
constitution for the oceans of the world. The
Conference could not have produced such a
comprehensive convention without the active
support and participation of all nations during
the long years of negotiation. We deeply regret
that the Conference was not able to adopt the
text of the Convention by consensus. No State can
remain aloof from the regime, and we must not be
swayed by any attempt to undermine it.
121. The United Nations has succeeded in
making human rights violations a legitimate
subject of interna¬tional scrutiny and it is
significant that the Secretary- General has
identified human rights promotion as a priority
area. Canada will support the Secretary- General
in these efforts. Effective procedures must be
worked out to deal with flagrant violations of
human rights.
122. A role of critical importance for the
United Nations is the peaceful resolution of
disputes. How¬ever maligned the Organization may
be concerning its efforts to resolve disputes, it
can achieve notable successes. In Namibia, the
United Nations has worked cut a balanced
settlement plan which should bring Namibia to
independence peacefully, and has obtained for
that plan general acceptance. The substantial
progress that has been made must be attributed in
part to the dedication and constructive approach
of the front-line States and the South West
Africa People's Organization [SW/1PO]. We hope
that remaining problems will be quickly resolved.
123. The appointment of a new
Secretary-General has come at a time when the
United Nations is facing unprecedented problems
and when the need for insti¬tutional reform has
become obvious. In his first report on the work
of the Organization, the Secretary- General has
addressed this need in direct and specific terms.
He has put forward several innovative
sugges¬tions, in particular directed at a more
effective Security Council. He has himself
undertaken to play a more direct role in bringing
urgent matters before the Council. These specific
proposals and the Secre¬tary-General's commitment
to administrative stream¬lining are very welcome
and should be encouraged. Pragmatic reforms must
be made or the United Nations will lose its
validity as a forum for interna¬tional
negotiations, not only for the promotion of peace
and security but also for the shaping of our,
economic future.
124. The aims of the institutions we have
invented are under considerable and potentially
crippling strain. We must rededicate these
institutions and the driving force of our
determination must be a sense of shared
vulnerability.
125. The present crisis demands intelligence
and will. Intelligence must lead us to a more
profound
Understanding of political and economic forces;
our will must reside in commitment to those
national con¬cessions dictated by our mutual
dependency. We cannot, must not, allow mutual
antagonisms or self- absorption to divert our
attention from the full range of difficulties
which we face, and which we must face together.