Nothing is created without men; nothing lasts without
institutions. Those words of Jean Monnet, one of the
founders of the European Union, remain as true as
ever. Security, climate change and some effects of
globalization are challenges that all our countries face.
That is why a global approach, with the United Nations
playing a central role, is needed. But the United
Nations must earn that central role. As President
Barack Obama said here (see ), we cannot
complain, on the one hand, about the so-called
unilateral action of the United States while at the same
time expecting it alone to solve all the world’s
problems.
In that spirit I would call for a new multilateral
commitment, as the reform of international institutions
is crucial in order to enhance their legitimacy,
representativeness and capacity for action. Nothing is
created without men; nothing lasts without institutions.
From now on, those institutions should work
efficiently, starting with the United Nations. It is
essential to move ahead rapidly on the reform of the
Security Council and of the functioning of the General
Assembly.
Indeed, there is an urgent need to improve the
efficiency of our own operations. A glance at the
organizational chart of the United Nations allows us to
see not only the overlaps but also the gaps in the
system. It is out of commitment to the Charter of the
United Nations that Belgium, one of the founding
Members, strongly appeals for more rigour and
transparency in the management and budget of the
United Nations in order to better use its limited
resources.
In addition to the fragmentation of the United
Nations system, two other trends reveal the need for
enhanced multilateral commitment. The first is the
multitude of regional and subregional organizations
almost everywhere in the world. It is true that this
multitude enhances international cooperation, but
regional and international organizations sometimes
lack harmonization. Better cooperation should
henceforth allow the optimal use of the resources of
all.
The second trend can be summed up by the words
“imperfect multilateralism”. Countries get together on
an informal basis to discuss international issues, for
example — and this is very pertinent — the economic
and financial crisis. These informal groups may,
particularly at first, expedite the decision-making of
international multilateral organizations, but they cannot
replace those organizations themselves because
multilateralism cannot be exclusive. Rather, it should
09-52592 26
be inclusive and transparent. Nothing can last without
institutions, but even the best organized institutions
cannot function in the absence of inspiration and
human will. Even the best organized institutions are
powerless when men prevent them from working.
The economic and financial crisis has been given
a great deal of attention, which is only natural. The
crisis most severely affects developing countries. It is
now more important than ever that donor countries
meet their official development assistance objectives of
0.7 per cent of the gross national product. Belgium
plans to achieve that goal in 2010.
The worst international disorder is violence
between States and within States. Within some States,
violence continues to kill, maim and rape millions of
people. The worst international disorder is reflected in
the wars, civil conflicts, inter-ethnic fighting and harsh
repression that deprive millions of people of a decent
existence. This is our first and foremost challenge
because without peace and security there is no
development, let alone sustainable development.
Without peace and security, there can be no fair
distribution of the wealth of our Earth.
As stipulated in the preamble of the Constitution
of UNESCO,
“since wars begin in the minds of men, it is in the
minds of men that the defences of peace must be
constructed”.
Indeed, conflict prevention begins with the banishment
of all hate speech attacking the dignity of human
beings, nations and communities, or the right of States
to exist. Far too often, we have witnessed bloodbaths
provoked by incitement to hatred. Such speech has no
place in this Hall or in this Organization, whose
primary mission is precisely to promote peace and
security through constructive cooperation.
To function efficiently, our multilateral
institutions need leaders and representatives of States
who share basic approaches established on the core
belief in the unique dignity of each human being.
National sovereignty implies responsibility. That is
why Belgium wholeheartedly supports the principle of
the responsibility to protect. The principle requires
Governments to safeguard their citizens against
genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes
against humanity. Incidentally, Belgium would like to
thank Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon for his excellent
report on this topic (A/63/677) and fully supports his
efforts in this area.
It is civilians, and women and children in
particular, who are often the primary victims of
violence and of indescribable and unacceptable
suffering. Indeed, women constitute half of the world’s
population, but too often we forget that human rights
also fully apply to them. In situations of war and
violence, women are frequently twofold victims
because of the sexual violence inflicted upon them. My
country is therefore determined to pursue its action
against sexual violence and any kind of violence
against children.
Wars are caused by men, not by weapons.
Nonetheless, the arms control issue has to be high on
the international agenda. That is why Belgium
welcomes the meeting of the Security Council at the
highest level on the subject of non-proliferation and
nuclear disarmament (S/PV.6191). That meeting was
undoubtedly a highlight of this week. Resolution
1887 (2009), adopted yesterday, represents, in our
opinion, a milestone for a world free of weapons of
mass destruction.
However, unfortunately, the latest news from Iran
seems to be heading in the opposite direction. My
country therefore endorses the very urgent call on Iran
and North Korea to cooperate with the international
community and respect the Security Council
resolutions that pertain to them. If they do not, they
will be ostracized by the international community.
At the same time, the fight against the
proliferation of weapons of mass destruction should
not make us overlook conventional weapons, which
currently kill on a massive scale. In particular, I refer
here to anti-personnel landmines. The Convention that
prohibits these weapons entered into force in 1999, and
Belgium hopes that it will be strengthened at the
Review Conference scheduled to take place in
Cartagena, Colombia, in early December. With respect
to that Convention, Belgium, along with Thailand, will
head the Standing Committee on Victim Assistance and
Socio-Economic Reintegration. Furthermore, Belgium
has spared no effort to push for the conclusion of the
Convention on Cluster Munitions.
Human rights in all their aspects are a major
concern for Belgium. That is why my country plays an
active role as a member of the Human Rights Council.
In that regard, I would like to thank the members of the
27 09-52592
Council that entrusted my country, Belgium, with the
responsibility and honour to preside over that
important institution. That trust is, in my view, a
recognition of our commitment.
Finally, human rights also concern the rights of
future generations. We do not own this Earth; we have
it on loan from our children. Today more than ever,
that heritage is threatened, and that is why
environmental protection should be our main shared
concern and priority. The Climate Change Conference
scheduled for late 2009 in Copenhagen is an
opportunity that cannot be squandered. We need to
make specific and binding commitments there. I
believe that the European Union has shown the way
with its ambitious package of measures adopted in late
2008.
Institutions cannot function without the input of
men. Therefore, those who undermine the performance
of these institutions should be held accountable. That is
why Belgium has been particularly active in the fight
against impunity. An international legal order is
required, but it can function only if it is upheld by
States governed by the rule of law. I therefore reaffirm
the need for common positions that are essential for a
world that is safer, fairer and more prosperous. In the
words of former Secretary-General Kofi Annan,
“There is no long-term security without
development. There is no development without
security. And no society can long remain secure,
or prosperous, without respect for human rights
and the rule of law.” (Press release
SG/SM/10425)
Strengthening the rule of law at the national and
international levels is more vital than ever for
achieving a more equitable form of globalization.
I will conclude with these words. Peace and
security, sustainable development, and a fair
distribution of the wealth of the Earth are the essential,
global challenges that we face. To meet these
challenges, we need solid international institutions, but
institutional multilateralism is not enough. We also
need a multilateralism of minds, and men and women
of conviction to carry it forward.
This will, belief and ambition motivate my
country, a founding Member of the United Nations, to
offer the candidacy for the presidency of the General
Assembly at its sixty-fifth session of our compatriot
Louis Michel, former Minister for Foreign affairs of
Belgium and former European Commissioner in charge
of Development and Humanitarian Aid. We are
convinced that the strength of his conviction and
dedication will unite us further. It is indeed only when
the men and women who take the floor here are fired
by a shared vision of human rights, peace and
development that our institutions will be able to deliver
what we need: collective results rather than individual
achievements.