The United Nations is the only
universal institution that unites us all as a global
community of independent States. At the very heart of
this indispensable Organization stands the General
Assembly, the only place in the world where the
sovereign voices of all countries are given an equal,
legitimate say in the future course of mankind.
Safeguarding the principles of the United Nations
Charter remains much more important than the policies
of any single nation, especially during transformative
periods such as this. The international system seems to
be undergoing a paradigm shift that, in many ways, is
comparable in scope to those that occurred in 1945 and
1989.
No one is yet able to reliably predict how deep
the change will turn out to be. What is becoming
evident is that interrelated factors — the most recent of
which is the global economic crisis — have caused the
arrival of a new set of circumstances on the world
stage. A broad repositioning appears to be taking place.
The global balance of power is shifting as new
financial models compete for primacy. All in all,
international relations are becoming less predictable.
Achieving consensus on fundamental issues that
affect us all has never been more important. As United
Nations Member States, it is incumbent upon us to
work more closely together to reaffirm the rules that
govern the international system, to reinforce the
territorial integrity of Member States, to entrench
interdependence and to complete the transition from
the old order, based on political and economic
domination, to one established on equitable
cooperation among all nations.
That is the only way to build a future of global
peace, stability and prosperity. It is the only way to
enhance the dialogue among civilizations, to make
multilateralism more effective and to provide for
sustainable development and eradicate poverty
throughout the world. And it is the only way to
effectively fight terrorism and cross-border organized
crime and to promote nuclear disarmament.
We must also work more in concert with one
another to combat the effects of climate change. That
09-52470 2
will continue to be strongly emphasized over the
course of Serbia’s two-year presidency of the
Governing Council of the United Nations
Environmental Programme. As part of our efforts, we
have proposed the establishment of a regional climate
change centre in Belgrade, Serbia.
As a responsible global citizen, we have
underlined the necessity of agreeing on a fair and
balanced emissions reduction scheme and, in
particular, on a new comprehensive climate
agreement — one that will secure eco-friendly
investments, stimulate innovation and facilitate the
global spread of technologies, knowledge and
experience.
In short, working towards a “green economy”
will decisively contribute to placing the whole world
firmly on the path towards a cleaner, more sustainable
path.
How we conduct ourselves at this time of great
transformation will constitute a precedent with far-
reaching consequences for generations to come. Simply
put, we are at a point of decision: will we choose a
world in which there are no rules as exceptions become
the new norms, devoid of any meaning except “might
makes right”? Or will we opt to solidify the great gains
achieved when the principles of an equitable
international order were embodied in the United
Nations Charter?
I believe that only the latter alternative provides a
future that all United Nations Member States can work
in concert to bring about. The starting point remains
universal respect for international law. No one should
be above it, no one should stand beyond its reach and
no one should feel at liberty to declare an exception to
its jurisdiction and scope. And yet that is precisely
what was recently attempted.
I come before the Assembly as the President of a
country that is trapped at the centre of one of the most
dangerous challenges to the universality of the
international system since the founding of the United
Nations. I speak of UDI — the unilateral declaration of
independence by the ethnic Albanian authorities of
Serbia’s southern province of Kosovo and Metohija.
This attempt at secession stands in direct violation of
Serbia’s democratic Constitution, as well as the basic
principles of the United Nations Charter, the Helsinki
Final Act and Security Council resolution 1244 (1999).
Some say Kosovo’s unilateral declaration of
independence is a unique case. But in truth it is an
attempt to forcibly partition a Member State of the
United Nations against its will and without regard for
the firm opposition of the Security Council. It is an
attempt to impose a nineteenth-century outcome on a
twenty-first century challenge. Serbia will never, under
any circumstances, implicitly or explicitly, recognize
the unilateral declaration of independence of the ethnic
Albanian authorities of our southern province.
We will continue to vigorously defend our
integrity in a non-confrontational manner, using all
peaceful means at our disposal. That is why, at the very
outset of this grave crisis, Serbia ruled out the use of
force. We chose to respond to Kosovo with the utmost
responsibility and restraint. Serbia opted for a
diplomatic approach, the result of which is that a vast
majority of United Nations Member States have
refrained from recognizing the unilateral declaration of
independence in Kosovo and have continued to abide
by their Charter obligation to respect the sovereignty
and territorial integrity of my country. On behalf of the
Republic of Serbia, allow me once again to sincerely
thank these countries for their adherence to the
principles of international law.
While categorically rejecting violence and
unilateralism, Serbia has been equally emphatic in
demanding that justice be delivered through the proper
legal means at the disposal of any United Nations
Member State. As part of our constructive approach,
we decided to contest the issue of Kosovo’s unilateral
declaration of independence before the principal
judicial organ of the United Nations, the International
Court of Justice, which was tasked by General
Assembly resolution 63/3 with issuing an advisory
opinion on whether that declaration is in accordance
with international law. I would like to take this
opportunity to inform the Member States that the Court
has concluded the preliminary, written phase of its
proceedings in the case. Public hearings are scheduled
to begin on 1 December, with a decision by the Court
expected sometime next year.
Let me express my sincere gratitude to all those
countries that have chosen to actively support Serbia’s
strategic choice to transfer the Kosovo issue to the
judicial arena. The case marks the first time in the
history of the Court that it has been asked to consider
the legality of an attempt at secession by an ethnic
group from a United Nations Member State. There is
3 09-52470
no doubt that the Court’s conclusions will constitute a
powerful legal precedent, with overarching
consequences for the United Nations system. The
outcome will either strongly deter other separatist
movements from attempting to secede, or produce a
result that could encourage them to act in a similar
fashion. Plainly stated, should Kosovo’s unilateral
declaration of independence be allowed to stand, a
door would open for challenging the territorial
integrity of any United Nations Member State.
The uniquely important nature of this case has
been acknowledged by the international community. As
we know, all five permanent members of the Security
Council have confirmed their participation in the
public hearings before the International Court of
Justice. It is in this context that I appeal to all Member
States to respect the fact that the Court continues to be
actively engaged on the issue. Its deliberations should
not be prejudged and its work should not be obstructed.
The Court’s proceedings have to be allowed to run
their course without political pressure, such as any
further recognition of Kosovo’s unilateral declaration
of independence. On behalf of the Republic of Serbia, I
encourage all non-recognizing Member States to stay
the course. By maintaining respect for my country’s
sovereignty and territorial integrity, together we will
help ensure that international law continues to close in
on the issue of unilateral declarations of independence.
Serbia’s decision to turn to the International
Court of Justice to contest the Kosovo issue has been
complemented by a policy of constructive engagement
with all legitimate actors on the ground in Kosovo. We
maintain support for a reconfigured United Nations
Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK)
and its continuing indispensability. We have also
welcomed a status-neutral European Union Rule of
Law Mission in Kosovo (EULEX), working in our
southern province on the basis of Security Council
resolution 1244 (1999), which continues to operate
under the overall authority of the United Nations. I call
on all responsible stakeholders invested in the future of
Kosovo to work more closely with the Government of
Serbia on implementing in full the Secretary-General’s
six-point plan (S/2008/354, annex I), which was
welcomed by the Security Council in November 2008.
This is a time for leadership and working
together, not for increasing the divide. We all have our
constraints, and they should be respected. Let us create
new opportunities for achieving practical results, by
engaging with one another on a host of concrete
questions for the benefit of all residents of Kosovo
province, including the Serbs — the community most
at risk in all of Europe.
(spoke in French)
Democracy in Serbia is sound; our society rests
on a solid foundation and our values have been
strongly confirmed by law. The basis of our strategic
approach to national development is the call for all
European nations to share their common destiny. On
many occasions our actions, in very difficult
circumstances, have proved our determination to
become a member of the European Union (EU).
Despite setbacks, our core strategic priority remains
that of attaining EU membership, not merely on
grounds of geography, heritage or economic prosperity,
but also because of the essential values that we share.
These are values that proclaim soft power in foreign
policy and the primacy of law in domestic affairs;
achieving consensus in Brussels and standards of
human rights throughout the EU. These are values that
proclaim freedom of movement for all citizens of
Serbia in the Schengen area, the tangible result of our
process of entry into the EU, which we hope to see
implemented on 1 January 2010. This will bring us
closer to Europe, for the right to travel without a visa is
to the citizens of Serbia the expression of what the EU
means on a daily basis.
But these are also values that have led us to
modernize our administration, to adopt exemplary
legislation in areas such as anti-discrimination and the
protection of minorities, and to redouble our efforts
towards regional reconciliation. That is an important
reason why Serbia will shortly complete its full
cooperation with the International Criminal Tribunal
for the Former Yugoslavia: it is a legal and moral
obligation towards victims, towards ourselves and,
above all, towards future generations.
As the twentieth anniversary of the fall of the
Berlin wall approaches, we must not forget that the
objective of uniting all the nations of Europe under the
same roof has not yet been attained. Much remains to
be done. Expansion fatigue must not emerge as a new
reality in Europe. Solidarity must remain a high
priority. It will never be time to consider an exit
strategy with regard to the Western Balkans.
Permit me to stress that the facts are clear. All
benefit from expansion: old and new members, as well
09-52470 4
as potential members of the EU. This goes beyond our
wildest dreams, even at a time of economic challenges
and political demoralization. That is because the values
that unite us are strong and just.
(spoke in English)
In that context, let me underline the necessity of
strengthening regional cooperation. In June, Serbia
hosted 15 heads of State during the Central European
Summit, whose main topic was the interdependence of
the economy, EU integration and energy. That
demonstrated our commitment to acting constructively
and working closely together with neighbouring
countries to ensure that regional peace is consolidated.
With regard to Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia is
a guarantor of the Dayton Agreement. Let there be no
doubt that we will remain committed to the sovereignty
and territorial integrity of that neighbouring country, as
we will to those of all other United Nations Member
States in the region and across the world.
In short, as the strategic anchor of stability in the
Western Balkans, Serbia will invest even greater efforts
in completing the democratic transformation of our
part of Europe.
Serbia’s robust European vision is complemented
by our strong determination to pursue a carefully
balanced, artfully executed and active foreign policy
aimed at engagement with nations throughout the
world, near and far. That is in our long-term interest
and will not change. Therefore, our engagement with
Brussels, Moscow, Washington and Beijing — the four
enduring pillars of Serbia’s foreign policy — will
continue to be strengthened in the time ahead.
In conclusion, I want to emphasize another
important dimension of our foreign policy. Serbia will
continue to deepen ties with proud nations across the
globe, many of which are members of the Non-Aligned
Movement (NAM). My country is the largest successor
to a founding member of the Movement. Serbia’s
capital, Belgrade, was the site of the first NAM
summit, held in 1961. That is why I have proposed that
the fiftieth anniversary of the Non-Aligned Movement
be celebrated in Belgrade with an extraordinary
summit under the auspices of the Egyptian
chairmanship.
Let me emphasize that Serbia will continue to
engage with NAM countries, not only to honour a
legacy from the past and to renew traditional
friendships, but also because we believe that
international stability and prosperity cannot be
consolidated without taking into account the views of
the majority in the global family of nations.
I close by saying that the time for anyone to
procrastinate, to try half-measures or to delay and
discourage is coming to a close. In its place, we are
entering a period in which only results matter — a
period of consequence and momentous choice. Now
comes our time of testing.
Our vision is simple: the universal application of
the principles contained in the United Nations Charter,
the strengthening of international law and human rights
in an increasingly interdependent world, the equitable
development of the global economy and the sustainable
management of the environment throughout the world.
Let us all have the courage to see that vision through to
its rapid and noble completion.