This year I
should like to devote most of my statement once again
to the important matter of the Comorian island of
Mayotte. This has been a dispute between us and
France for more than three decades. It is our hope that
there will be greater understanding and more active
solidarity on this matter on the part of this Assembly.
It is my belief that the future of my country, the
Union of the Comoros, depends on peace and stability.
But there can be no lasting stability in my country
without a final solution to this problem. Accordingly,
this year we have once again requested that an item on
the Comorian island of Mayotte be included on the
agenda of the sixty-fifth session of the General
Assembly.
I also take this opportunity to express the deep
gratitude of the Comorian people for the valuable and
unwavering support of the African Union, the League
of Arab States and the Organization of the Islamic
Conference on this issue.
I would like to begin by recalling that, pursuant
to recommendations of the United Nations, the highest
French authorities have themselves affirmed that the
Comoros should accede to independence within
inviolable borders. Thus, former French President Mr.
Valéry Giscard d’Estaing declared, inter alia, that the
Comoros are and always have been an entity and that it
is natural that they have a common destiny.
I also deem it vital and timely to recall today
certain resolutions of our Organization confirming the
legitimacy of the Comorian claim to the island of
Mayotte. These include resolution 1514 (XV), of
14 December 1960, on the granting of independence to
colonial countries and peoples, which guarantees the
national unity and territorial integrity of such countries
on regaining their sovereignty. Resolution 3291
(XXIX), of 13 December 1974, reaffirms the integrity
and unity of the Comoro Archipelago. In addition,
resolution 3385 (XXX), of 12 November 1975, adopted
a few months after the independence of the Comoros,
affirms the admission of the Comoro Archipelago,
composed of the islands of Mayotte, Anjouan, Mohéli
and Grande-Comore, to the United Nations.
Lastly, the historic resolution 31/4, of 21 October
1976, underscores the right of the Comoros and the
duties of France with regard to that independent
country. Allow me to read out the provisions of that
resolution that is of paramount importance to my
country and which will remain forever etched in the
memory of my Comorian compatriots.
19 10-54965
“Considering that the occupation by France
of the Comorian island of Mayotte constitutes a
flagrant encroachment on the national unity of the
Comorian State, a Member of the United Nations,
“Considering that such an attitude on the
part of France constitutes a violation of the
principles of the relevant resolutions of the
United Nations, in particular of General
Assembly resolution 1514 (XV) of 14 December
1960 concerning the granting of independence to
colonial countries and peoples, which guarantees
the national unity and territorial integrity of such
countries,
“1. Condemns and considers null and void
the referendums of 8 February and 11 April 1976
organized in the Comorian island of Mayotte by
the Government of France, and rejects:
“(a) Any other form of referendum or
consultation which may hereafter be organized on
Comorian territory in Mayotte by France;
“(b) Any foreign legislation purporting to
legalize any French colonial presence on
Comorian territory in Mayotte;
“2. Strongly condemns the presence of
France in Mayotte, which constitutes a violation
of the national unity, territorial integrity and
sovereignty of the independent Republic of the
Comoros;” (resolution 31/4, third and fourth
preambular paragraphs and paras. 1 and 2).
France refuses to comply with all those relevant
resolutions adopted by the General Assembly relating
to the Comorian island of Mayotte and continues to
violate the principle of the inviolability of colonial
borders. It must be recalled that the principle of the
inviolability of borders became a rule of customary
international law, codified under paragraph 6 of
resolution 1514 (XV), which stipulates that:
“Any attempt aimed at the partial or total
disruption of the national unity and the territorial
integrity of a country is incompatible with the
purposes and principles of the Charter of the
United Nations.”
That same resolution recalls in its paragraph 7 that:
“All States shall observe faithfully and
strictly the provisions of the Charter of the United
Nations, the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights and the present Declaration on the basis of
equality, non-interference in the internal affairs of
all States, and respect for the sovereign rights of
all peoples and their territorial integrity.”
International jurisprudence fully recognizes that
principle of the indivisibility of colonial entities. In the
judgment handed down on 11 September 1992 in a
dispute between Honduras and El Salvador, the
International Court of Justice in The Hague declared
that the principle of the inviolability of colonial
borders is a retroactive principle that changes
administrative boundaries originally designed for other
purposes into international borders.
For many years, my country has called the
international community to witness and has made
known its readiness to seek a fair and just solution
bilaterally. The response to our position was crushing.
France not only took unilateral steps in 1994 to hinder
the free circulation of persons by introducing a visa for
all Comorians wishing to visit Mayotte, part of
Comorian territory, but also, in 2000, it began the
process of making the island a department, which is
illegal under international law.
I wish to stress that the imposition of a visa
requirement in 1994 had truly tragic human
consequences. The small slice of the sea of
approximately 70 kilometres separating Anjouan from
the sister island of Mayotte has now become the largest
maritime cemetery in the world. To date, nearly 7,000
people have been killed.
Moreover, while we had agreed to establish a
high-level working group to relaunch the dialogue in
order to consider together equitable and just solutions,
on 29 May 2009 France organized another referendum
aimed at changing the status of the island of Mayotte
into an overseas department.
We are surprised that, despite all the good will
demonstrated by the Comorian side — and in particular
the innovative proposal on Mayotte known as “one
country, two systems” or two administrations, which I
myself introduced at an earlier session of this
Assembly — there has been no positive response from
France to that outstretched hand. The dual system
would be a compromise that would finally ensure
respect for international law, while enabling France to
continue to legally administer the Comorian island of
Mayotte during a period to be mutually agreed. It
would also enable our Mahorais brothers and sisters,
10-54965 20
whom I love dearly, to preserve their social status and
standard of living, and the three other islands to finally
take up the many challenges of development in peace
and stability.
But France wants to know nothing about this
compromise. Faced with such an attitude, we find
ourselves obliged to request our dear Organization to
require France to respect and comply with international
law, implement the various relevant United Nations
resolutions on the Comorian island of Mayotte, and to
reconsider its position on our offer, which clearly
represents a huge sacrifice on the part of my country,
which in fact is within its rights.
What is at stake is the future of the Comoros, a
small sovereign country Member of the United
Nations. Also at stake is the honour of France, a great
country whose ideals of liberty, equality and fraternity
so strongly and profoundly inspired the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights and the principles
underpinning our Charter. Ultimately, what is at stake
is the honour of our Organization, whose very
credibility would be sorely challenged should
international law and legality continue to be
disregarded and the territorial integrity of the Comoros
continue to be violated.
The United Nations is the guarantor of respect for
international law. It is duty-bound to require that its
Members’ legislation complies fully with the relevant
resolutions. I can only endorse the statement of the
President of the General Assembly, His Excellency Mr.
Joseph Deiss, who said at the opening of this session
that the United Nations is the guarantor of global
governance and enjoys a global legitimacy.
I cannot end my statement without reiterating that
the Comoros supports the efforts of the international
community, and more specifically the personal efforts
of His Excellency President Barack Hussein Obama, to
establish a just and lasting peace in the Middle East
enabling the Palestinian people to live freely and safely
in an independent State and to enjoy fully all their
legitimate rights.
My country also pays tribute to efforts to bring an
end to the fratricidal conflicts that are ripping apart the
Sudan, Afghanistan, Somalia, the Democratic Republic
of the Congo and the Great Lakes region.
We also reiterate our strong support for the
territorial integrity of the brotherly Kingdom of
Morocco and our full backing for the Moroccan
autonomy proposal as a definitive political compromise
solution to the regional dispute over the Moroccan
Sahara.
We also reiterate our unwavering support for the
legitimate demands of the People’s Republic of China
for the return of Taiwan to China’s fold.
It is through peace, stability and security and
respect for international law that our nations will be
able to attain the development goals they have set
themselves to help our peoples. I therefore have full
trust that our Organization shall continue to make these
ideals its main focus.
We must, as soon as possible, implement the
agreements and resolutions that we have agreed in
order to find peaceful and definitive solutions to all
outstanding issues, because any delay in or suspension
of our search for such solutions would create
additional, similar issues and crises in other countries
and spark the flames of extremism and terrorism
throughout the world. We hope that we shall find
solutions that will lead to the happiness and well-being
of all our peoples.