Yesterday was exactly the fiftieth anniversary
of the first speech of Commander in Chief Fidel Castro
Ruz in this Hall, with that memorable sentence that if
the philosophy of plunder disappears, then the
philosophy of war will have disappeared (see
A/PV.872).
10-55122 46
Sixty million people had to die in the Second
World War so that the leaders of the time could create
the United Nations with the aim of saving succeeding
generations from the scourge of war.
Today, the children and grandchildren of that
generation realize that the human race is faced with the
threat of extinction. Within a few decades, the
degradation of living conditions on the planet will be
irreversible. The same could happen in a few hours if
only a small part of the nuclear arsenal were to be
used. Those who met in San Francisco to draft the
Charter of the United Nations could not have imagined
the threat now posed by global warming or the nuclear
winter.
While we deliberate here, as Comrade Fidel has
warned, powerful and influential forces in the United
States and Israel are paving the way to launch a
military attack against the Islamic Republic of Iran.
For its part, the Security Council, possibly under the
illusion of preventing that, is going ahead with
applying sanctions against that country, which,
together with the unilateral sanctions illegally imposed
by a group of States, seek to strangle the Iranian
economy.
The recent and politically biased report issued by
the Director General of the International Atomic
Energy Agency has contributed to increasing the
tensions and has provided a pretext for military
escalation. Should that aggression in fact materialize, it
would be a crime against the Iranian people and an
assault against peace and international law that could
ignite a conflict that will certainly turn nuclear. The
toll would be millions of lives and the impact on the
environment, the economy and world stability
incalculable.
Who could assert otherwise, and on the basis of
what guarantees? How could it be argued that the
present course of events is distancing the planet from
war in the Middle East? The threat is too serious to
trust in the capacity of the Security Council, where the
main actor responsible for the crisis has relied on its
ability to impose its designs.
The wars against Iraq and Afghanistan
demonstrate that we cannot entrust one or a few
Governments with the authority to decide when all
diplomatic steps to prevent a war have been exhausted,
when the use of force becomes unavoidable, and when
the death of hundreds of thousands or millions of
people and the destabilization of a large area of the
planet — or all these things together — are inevitable.
Sanctions, sieges and conflict are not the way to
preserve international peace and security. On the
contrary, dialogue, negotiation and adherence to the
principle of the sovereign equality of States are the
only way to avoid war.
Cuba commends and encourages the efforts of all
those countries, such as China, Russia, Brazil and
Turkey, that strive to find peaceful solutions, and calls
on the international community to support such
initiatives. It is the duty of this General Assembly to
officially support those efforts.
The United Nations must be radically reformed
and the powers of this General Assembly restored. The
Security Council must be recreated. It must be
reiterated that the Secretary-General and all senior
officials of the international agencies, including the
International Atomic Energy Agency, answer to all
Member States, as set out in clear mandates adopted in
accordance with the Charter and the rules of procedure.
The serious threat posed by nuclear weapons will be
solved only with their total elimination and prohibition.
The manipulation surrounding non-proliferation — based
on double standards and political interest, the existence of
a club of the privileged and the denial to the countries of
the South of the peaceful uses of nuclear energy — must
stop. We urge the United States, the main nuclear Power,
to stop opposing the negotiation of binding agreements
that could rid us once and for all of this threat within a set
time frame. Given the great lethal power and the ongoing
development of conventional weapons, we will also have
to fight for complete and general disarmament.
In order to move ahead on those tasks, the
Non-Aligned Movement submitted a proposal that has
gone unheeded. The proposal envisages a plan of
action that includes the establishment of nuclear-
weapon-free zones. It is urgent to establish such a zone
in the Middle East, where Israel is the only country
that opposes it. Success in this effort would contribute
significantly to dispelling the threats of conflict and
nuclear proliferation and to achieving lasting peace in
that region.
The floods that have affected Pakistan, Central
America and many other countries in the most diverse
latitudes, as well as the droughts and extreme
temperatures that have devastated Russia, are a tragic
reminder of the threats of a climate out of balance. In
47 10-55122
the face of such a serious threat, no selfish interests or
narrow political agendas that prevent the adoption of
concrete and binding agreements at the next
Conference of the Parties to the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change should
prevail. The developed countries, which bear the
greatest responsibility for global warming, should
accept more ambitious goals for reducing greenhouse
gas emissions and refrain from destroying the
framework established by the Convention and its
Kyoto Protocol.
It would be very irresponsible of the
Governments of the industrialized countries to ignore
the legitimate claims of the non-governmental
organizations and social movements that were brutally
suppressed in Copenhagen and later met in
Cochabamba barely five months ago to defend Mother
Earth, or to again seek to deceive public opinion by
blaming the emerging economies.
We call for the full support of the international
community for Venezuela in its struggle. The victory in
yesterday’s parliamentary elections demonstrates the
broad majority support of the people for President
Chávez and the Bolivarian revolution, which have
suffered North American interference and the scorn and
disinformation campaigns of the oligarchic groups and
media empires.
Now that the television cameras have left Haiti,
we call for the pledges of international assistance to be
honoured. The noble Haitian people need resources for
reconstruction and, above all, for development.
The United States Government is aware of Cuba’s
readiness to coexist in a climate of peace, respect and
sovereign equality, which we have expressly conveyed
through official channels and which I reiterate here on
behalf of President Raúl Castro. I am convinced that
the development of relations based on international law
and the purposes and principles of the United Nations
would enable Cuba and the United States to address
many of their differences and to resolve others. It
would help to create an atmosphere conducive to trying
to solve the problems of our region and, at the same
time, provide significant support to the interests of our
respective peoples.
The agenda for dialogue and bilateral cooperation
initiatives submitted to President Obama’s Administration
on 14 July 2009, which I publicly announced in this Hall
exactly a year ago (see A/64/PV.11), have yet to receive a
response. The North American Government has shown no
willingness to address essential matters on the bilateral
agenda, so the official talks that have been held without
great progress have been limited to specific issues.
Contrary to expectations, even within the United
States itself, its Government does not seem willing to
amend even the most irrational and universally rejected
aspects of its policy against Cuba. The main element in
our bilateral relations is the economic, commercial and
financial blockade that the United States Government
imposes against my country directly and through the
extraterritorial application of its laws. The blockade
has been the subject of 18 resolutions that, with the
almost unanimous support of Member States, have
consistently called for its end.
However, in the past two years, there has been no
change in the policy of blockade and subversion
against Cuba, even though all know that the President
of that country is vested with sufficient authority to
make real change and enjoys the broad majority
support of the North American people in that respect.
For United States citizens or foreigners residing
in that country, travelling to Cuba remains illegal. It is
impossible to sell Cuban products or products
containing Cuban components or technology to the
United States. With very limited exceptions, Cuba is
forbidden to acquire, here or in any other country, any
product containing a fraction of American input or
technology. Financial transactions in United States
dollars, whether linked to Cuba or not, can be either
confiscated or frozen and the banks involved may be
fined. Fines worth several millions are imposed on
United States and foreign companies for violating the
venal blockade laws.
In addition, and in open contradiction of
international norms, Cuba’s broadcasting space
continues to be violated and radio and television
broadcasts continue to be used for subversive purposes,
while millions in federal funds are used to foment
political instability in my country. Part of Cuba’s
territory has been seized by the United States, which
has imposed a military base in Guantánamo that has
become a centre of torture beyond the jurisdiction of
international humanitarian law.
United States immigration policy towards Cuba,
based on the Cuban Adjustment Act, is a politically
motivated exception that encourages illegal migration
and costs human lives. Cuba’s inclusion on the United
10-55122 48
States’ spurious list of countries that sponsor
international terrorism is deeply immoral.
Our demand, and the universal appeal concerning
it, is well known. The five Cuban anti-terrorists who
have been incarcerated in the United States for 12 years
as political prisoners must be immediately released.
Setting them free would be an act of justice that would
enable President Obama to show his true commitment to
combating terrorism in our own hemisphere.
The President of the United States still has the
opportunity to make a historical rectification of an
utterly futile 50-year genocidal policy left over from
the cold war. It would be an act of resolve that could
only encourage the support of those who elected him
for change and of the community of nations that votes
for it every year. Whatever the circumstances, the
Cuban revolution will unyieldingly and tenaciously
pursue the sovereign path chosen by our people and
shall not cease in its endeavours, based on the precepts
of Martí and Fidel, to overcome all injustice.