United States of America

I begin by paying a tribute to the new Secretary-General, who has brought great distinction to the office during his brief tenure. Dag Hammarskjold once told the General Assembly that whichever word one chooses independence, impartiality, objectivity—they all describe essential aspects of what, without exception, must be in the attitude of the Secretary-General . Javier Perez de CueBar, a man of the third world, and, I am proud to note, of the New World as well, has already demonstrated his strict adherence to this most exacting standard. In so doing, he has earned the esteem of my Government and the gratitude of all who believe in the purposes of the Charter. 197. I also congratulate Mr. Hollai of Hungary upon his election as President of the thirty-seventh session of the General Assembly. 198. As I stand here today I cannot help but reflect on my relation to this city and to this Hall. I was born about four miles from here. I was reared and educated not far away, just across the Hudson River, and I took a tour through this building just after it opened in 1952, marveling at the reality of a temple erected in the hope, at least, of abolishing war. , 199. When I took that tour back in the early 1950s, there was great public interest in what was called the Meditation Room. I understand the room is still here. But in the years since then this institution has become more famous for talk than for meditation. This Hall has heard great ideas eloquently expressed. It has also heard double-talk, platitudes and ringing protestations of innocence—all too often aimed at camouflaging outrageous and inhuman acts. 200. But we must not ridicule words. I believe that the greatest advance in human history was not the wheel, the use of electricity, or the internal combustion engine. Indispensable to progress as these have been, our most remarkable achievement was the slow, clumsy but triumphant creation of language. It was words that released our ancestors from the prison of the solitary. Words gave us the means to transmit to our children and the future the crowning jewel of human existence: knowledge. The Code of Ham¬murabi, the Bible, the Analects of Confucius, the teachings of the Buddha, the Koran, the insights of Shakespeare, the creed of Mahatma Gandhi or Martin Luther King—all these were arrangements of words. 201. Is it not profoundly revealing that the first victims of tyrants are words? No people better know the meaning of freedom than those who have been arrested or beaten or imprisoned or exiled because of what they said. A single man speaking out—a Lech Walesa, for example—is more dangerous than an armored division. 202. All of us here, whether we arrived after a short one-hour flight, as I did, or came from the other side of the globe, as many others of those present did, enter this auditorium for one main purpose—to talk about what our Governments see as the problems ahead and how they should be solved. On one point at least we can all agree—the problems are many and difficult. I shall not try, in the minutes allotted me, to deal with each, or even most, of these issues in detail. Instead, I want to give the Assembly some sense of the principles and general approach that the United States will take toward our common problems. 203. Americans are, by history and by inclination, a practical and pragmatic people, yet a people with a vision. It is the vision—usually simple and sometimes naive—that has so often led us to dare and to achieve. President Reagan's approach to foreign policy is grounded squarely on standards drawn from the pragmatic American experience. As de Tocqueville pointed out, To achieve its objective, America relies on personal interest, and gives full reign to the strength and reason of the individual. That is as true now as when it was said 150 years ago. Our principal instru¬ment, now as then, is freedom. Our adversaries are the oppressors, the totalitarian, the tacticians of fear and pressure. 204. On this foundation, President Reagan's ideas and the structure of his foreign policy are so straight-forward that those of us enmeshed in day-to-day details may easily lose sight of them. The President never does, he consistently brings us back to funda¬mentals. Today I will talk about those fundamentals. They consist of four ideas that guide our actions: we will start from realism; we will act from strength, both in power and in purpose; we will stress the indispensable need to generate consent, build agree¬ments and negotiate on key issues, and we will conduct ourselves in the belief that progress is possible, even though the road to achievement is long and hard. 205. If we are to change the world, we must first understand it. We must face reality, with all its anguish and all its opportunities. Our era needs those who, as Pericles said, have the clearest vision of what is before them, glory and danger alike, and notwithstanding that, go out to meet it. 206. Reality is not an illusion or a sleight of hand, though many would have us believe otherwise. The enormous, grinding machinery of Soviet propaganda daily seeks to distort reality, to bend truth for its own purposes. Our world is occupied by far too many Governments which seek to conceal truth from their own people. They wish to imprison reality by con¬trolling what can be read or spoken or heard. They would have us believe that black is white and up is down. 207. Much of present-day reality is unpleasant. To describe conditions as we see them as I do today and as President Reagan has over the course of his presidency, is not to seek confrontation—far from it. Our purpose is to avoid misunderstanding and to create the necessary pre-conditions for change. 208. So, when we see aggression, we will call it aggression. When we see subversion, we will call it subversion. When we see repression, we will call it repression. 209. The events in Poland, for example, cannot be ignored or explained away. The Polish people want to be their own master. Years of systematic tyranny could not repress this desire; and nor will martial law. But in Poland today truth must hide in comers. 210. Nor can we simply turn our heads and look the other way as Soviet divisions brutalize an entire population in Afghanistan. The resistance of the Afghan people is a valiant saga of our times. We demean that valour if we do not recognize its source. 211. And Soviet surrogates intervene in many coun¬tries, creating a new era of colonialism at the moment in history when peoples around the globe had lifted that burden from their backs. 212. Nor will we shy away from speaking of other problems affecting the free and the developing worlds. Much of the developing world is threatened by a crisis of confidence in financial institutions and the stultifying effects of State-controlled economies. The naturally vibrant economies of many Western nations and trade between the world's major trading partners are threatened by recession and rising protectionism. The great alliances that shore up world stability and growth—our hemispheric partnership, NATO—and the Western and Japanese industrial democracies are challenged by new as well as chronic strains. 213. Finally, the shadow of war still darkens the future of us all. There is no ultimate safety in a nuclear balance of terror constantly contested. There is no peace of mind at a time when increasing numbers of nations appear willing to launch their armies into battle for causes which seem local but have ramifica¬tions for regional and even global harmony. 214. The list of troubles is long, the danger of despair great. But there is another side to the present reality; it is a reality of hope. We are living in a fantastic time of opportunity. 215. Historians in the future will surely marvel at the achievements of human beings in the last half of this century. We have expanded the frontiers of thought—in science, in biology, in engineering, in painting and music and mathematics, in technology and architecture—far beyond the point anyone could have dared predict, much less hope for. We know much today about the oceans and forests and the geological strata that lock in the story of our past. We have more knowledge about a baby, or the brain, than was accumulated in 10 millennia before our time. We are learning to produce food for all of us; we are no longer helpless before the threat of disease; we explore our universe as a matter of course. We are confronting the nature of Nature herself. The oppor¬tunities are grand. This, too, is a clear reality. 216. Thus realism shows us a world deeply troubled, yet with reason for hope. There is one necessary condition: the only way we can enhance and amplify the human potential is by preserving, defending and extending those most precious of conditions—freedom and peace. 217. America's yearning for peace does not lead us to be hesitant in developing our strength or in using it when necessary. Indeed, clarity about the magnitude of the problems we face leads inevitably to a realistic appreciation of the importance of American strength. The strength of the free world imposes restraint, invites accommodation and reassures those who would share in the creative work that is the wonderful consequence of liberty. 218. Strength means military forces to ensure that no other nation can threaten us, our interests or our friends. But when I speak of strength I do not mean military power alone. To Americans, strength derives as well from a solid economic base and social vitality at home and with our partners. And, most funda¬mentally, the true wellspring of strength lies in America's moral commitment. 219. The bulwark of America's strength is military power for peace. The American people have never accepted weakness, or hesitancy or abdication. We will not put our destiny into the hands of the ruthless. Americans today are emphatically united on the neces¬sity of a strong defense. This year's defense budget will ensure that the United States will help its friends and allies defend themselves—to make sure that peace is seen clearly by all to be the only feasible course in world affairs. 220. Along with military readiness and capability must come the willingness to employ it in the cause of peace, justice and security. Today in Beirut the United States Marines—together with our allies, Italy and France—are helping the Lebanese Government und armed forces ensure the safety of the peoples of that tormented capital. I regret to report that I have just learned that one American Marine died and several were injured today in a mine explosion at the Beirut airport. Our marines represent an extension of American power not for war but to secure the peace. They are there to speed the moment when all foreign forces depart from Lebanon. There must be an early agreement on a timetable for the full application of Lebanon's independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity. Lebanon deserves the world's help—to secure peace and to rebuild a thriving society. 221. America will continue to use its strength with prudence, firmness and balance. We intend to command the respect of adversaries and to deserve the confidence of allies and partners. 222. The engine of America's strength is a sound economy. 223. In a time of recession, industrialized and less developed nations alike are bedeviled by excessive inflation, restricted markets, unused capacity, stagnating trade, growing pressure for protectionism and the most potent enemy of expansion—pervasive uncertainty. 224. The United States with its vast human and scientific resources can survive an era of economic strife and decay. But our moral commitment and our self-interest require us to use our technological and productive abilities to build lasting prosperity at home and to contribute to a sound economic situation abroad. 225. President Reagan has instituted a bold pro¬gram to get the American economy moving. Our rate of inflation is down markedly, and we will keep it down. That will add stability to the value of the dollar and give greater confidence to international financial markets. 226. The recent drop in United States interest rates will stimulate new investments within and beyond our shores. Conservation through market pricing of energy has reduced United States demand for world energy supplies. We are putting the recession behind us. A growing and open American economy will provide new markets for goods and services produced elsewhere, and new opportunities for foreign invest¬ments. Just as we have a stake in world-wide recovery, others will prosper as our recovery develops. 227. For wider prosperity to take hold, we must co¬operatively attend to these international issues. The lure of protectionist trade policies must be resisted everywhere—here in the United States and all over the world—whether in the form of overt import restrictions and export subsidies or by more subtle domestic pro¬grammes. These can only distort world trade and impair growth everywhere. Let us determine to make the November ministerial meeting of GATT a time to stem these protectionist pressures and to reinvigorate positive efforts for a more open trading system. 228. The implications of the external debt of many nations must be understood. Immediate debt problems are manageable if we use good sense and avoid destabilizing actions. But the magnitude of external debt will almost inevitably reduce resources available for future lending for development purposes. Economic adjustment is imperative. IMF can provide critical help and guidance in any country's efforts to smooth the adjustment process. The new borrowing arrange¬ment proposed by the United States can be crucial to this effort. ' 229. And the necessity of reducing government interference in the market must be recognized. Of course every nation has the right to organize society as its inhabitants wish, but economic facts cannot be ignored. Those facts clearly demonstrate that the world's command economies have failed abysmally to meet the needs of their peoples. The newly pros¬perous industrialized nations are those with the most free and open markets. 230. The bedrock of our strength is our moral and spiritual character. The sources of true strength lie deeper than economic or military power. They lie in the dedication of a free people which knows its responsibility. America's institutions are those of freedom accessible to every person and of govern¬ment as the accountable servant of the people. Equal opportunity, due process of law, open trial by jury, freedom of belief, speech and assembly, our Bill of Rights, our guarantees of liberty and limited govern¬ment were hammered out in centuries of ordeal. Because we care about these human values for ourselves so must we then be concerned, and legiti¬mately so, with abuses of freedom, justice and humanitarian principles beyond our borders. This is why we will speak and act for prisoners of con¬science, against terrorism and against the brutal silencing of the Soviet Helsinki Watch Committee. This is why we are anxious to participate in periodic reviews of the human rights performance of ourselves as well as of others. We welcome scrutiny of our own system. We are not perfect and we know it, but we have nothing to hide. 231. Our belief in liberty guides our policies here in' the United Nations as elsewhere. Therefore in this forum the United States will continue to insist upon fairness, balance and truth. We take the debate on human rights seriously. We insist upon honesty in the use of language; we will point out inconsistencies, double standards and lies. We will not compromise our commitment to truth. 232. The world has work to do for the realists, the pragmatists and the free. With a clear understanding of the troubled circumstances of the hour and with a strengthened ability to act, we need as well the vision to see beyond the immediate present. 233. All of us here represent nations which must understand and accept the imperative of fair engage¬ment on the issues before us and, beyond that, of common effort towards shared goals. Whether we are seeking to bring peace to regional conflict or a reso¬lution of commercial differences, the time of imposed solutions has passed. Conquest, pressure, acqui¬escence under duress was common in decades not long past—but not today. Not everybody who wants his concern addressed will find us automatically receptive. But when negotiations are in order America is prepared to go to work on the global agenda and to do so in a way that all may emerge better off and more secure than before. 234. We manage our problems more intelligently and with greater mutual understanding when we can bring ourselves to recognize these problems as expressions of mankind's basic dilemma. We are seldom confronted with simple issues of right and wrong, between good and evil. Only those who do not bear the direct burden of responsibility for decision and action can indulge themselves in the denial of that reality. The task of statesmanship is to mediate between two—or several— causes, each of which often has a legitimate claim. 235. It is on this foundation that the United States stands ready to try to solve the problems of our time —to overcome chaos, deprivation and the heightened dangers of an era in which ideas and cultures too often tend to clash and technologies threaten to out¬pace our institutions of control. 236. We are engaged in negotiations and efforts to find answers to issues affecting every part of the globe and every aspect of our lives upon it. Let me take up just two of these with you. 237. The agony of the Middle East now exceeds the ability of news bulletins or speeches to express: it is a searing wound on our consciousness. The region is in constant ferment. Unrest flares into violence, terror, insurrection and civil strife. War follows war. It is clear to everyone in this Hall that international peace, security and co-operative progress cannot be truly achieved until this terrible regional conflict is settled. 238. AM of us have witnessed in the past several months a graphic reminder of the need for practical peace negotiations in the Middle East. Of the nations in the world which need and deserve peace, Israel surely holds a pre-eminent place. Of the peoples of the world who need and deserve a place with which they can truly identify, the Palestinian claim is undeniable. 239. But Israel can have permanent peace only in a context in which the Palestinian people also realize their legitimate rights. Similarly, the Palestinian people will be able to achieve their legitimate rights only in a context which gives to Israel what it so clearly has a right to demand: to exist, and to exist in peace and security. 240. This most complex of international conflicts cannot be resolved by force: neither the might of armies nor the violence of terrorists can succeed in imposing the will of the strong upon the weak. Nor can it be settled simply by the rhetoric of even the most carefully worded document. It can be resolved only through the give and take of direct negotiations, leading to the establishment of practical arrangements on the ground. In other words, it can be resolved only through hard work. For those who believe that there is no contradiction between permanent peace for Israel and the legitimate rights of the Palestinian people—and fbr those who believe that both are essential for peace and that neither can be achieved without the other—the task can truly be a labour of love. 241. On 1 September President Reagan challenged the parties to the Arab-Israeli conflict to make a fresh start on the road to peace in the Middle East. The Camp David agreements, resting squarely on Security Council resolution 242 (1967), with its formula of peace for territory, remain available to those who would accept the challenge to make this journey with us. The road will not be easy, but in his statement President Reagan made a number of proposals which, for those who are willing to join the effort, make the journey safer and easier. 242. I call on all concerned to accept President Reagan's challenge and hasten the realization of true peace in the Middle East, 243. In addition to the imperative need to resolve regional problems, there is an equally significant global imperative: to halt, and reverse, the global arms build¬up. As an American, I am aware that arms control and disarmament are a special responsibility of the world's most powerful nations, the United States and the Soviet Union. And as an American, I can report that we are fulfilling our responsibility to seek to limit and reduce conventional and nuclear arms to the lowest possible levels. 244. With this goal in mind, President Reagan has initiated a comprehensive program for negotiated arms reductions. In Central Europe, the most heavily armed region on this planet, the Western allies are seeking substantial reductions in troops of NATO and the Warsaw Pact to equal levels. To achieve this goal, we have recently introduced a new proposal designed to revitalize the Vienna Talks on Mutual Reduction of Forces, Armaments and Associated Measures in Central Europe. 245. In the area of strategic arms, the United States has also taken the initiative by calling for a one-third reduction in the number of nuclear warheads that American and Soviet ballistic missiles can deliver. And in the talks in Geneva on intermediate-range nuclear forces, the United States has gone even further, by asking the Soviet Union to agree to a bold proposal for eliminating an entire category of weapons from the arsenals of the two sides. 246. But important as these negotiations are, the problems of arms controls cannot be left to the two super-Powers. The threat of nuclear proliferation extends to every region in the world and demands the attention and energy of every Government. This is not solely, or even primarily, a concern of the super¬ powers. The non-nuclear countries will not be safer if nuclear intimidation is added to already deadly regional conflicts. The developing nations will not be more prosperous if scarce resources and scientific talent are diverted to nuclear weapons and delivery systems. 247. Unfortunately, as the task becomes more im¬portant it also becomes more difficult. Greater quantities of dangerous materials are produced and new suppliers emerge who lack a clear commitment to non-proliferation. But the technology that helped to create the problems can supply answers as well. Vigorous action to strengthen the barriers to aggres¬sion and to resolve disputes peacefully can remove the insecurities that are the root of the problem. The United States, for its part, will work to tighten export controls; to promote broader acceptance of safeguards; to urge meaningful actions when agreements are violated; and to strengthen IAEA. As our action last week in Vienna should make clear, we will not accept attempts to politicize—and therefore emasculate— such vital institutions. 248. Perhaps the most common phrase spoken by the American people in our more than two centuries of national life has been you can't stop progress . Our people have always been imbued with the conviction that the future of a free people would be good. America continues to offer that vision to the world. With that vision, and with the freedom to act creatively, there is nothing that people of good will need fear. 249. I am not here to assert, however, that the way is easy, or quick, or that the future is bound to be bright. There is a poem by Carl Sandburg in which a traveler asks the Sphinx to speak and reveal the distilled wisdom of all the ages. The Sphinx does speak. Its words are: Don't expect too much . That is good counsel for ail of us here. It does not mean that great accomplishments are beyond our reach. We can help shape more constructive international rela¬tions and give our children a better chance at life. It does mean, however, that risk, pain, expense, and above all endurance are needed to bring these achieve¬ments into our grasp. 250. We must recognize the complex and vexing character of this world. We should not indulge our¬selves in fantasies of perfection of unfulfillable plans, or solutions gained by pressure. It is the responsibility of leaders not to feed the growing appetite for easy promises and grand assurances. The plain truth is this: we face the prospect of all too few decisive or dramatic breakthroughs; we face the necessity of dedicatingour energies and creativity to a protracted struggle towards eventual success. 251. That is the approach of my country, because we see not only the necessity but the possibility, of making important progress on a broad front. For example: despite deep-seated differences between us and the Soviet Union, both sides are now at work in a serious, businesslike effort at arms control; Presi¬dent Reagan has issued an important call for an inter¬national conference on military expenditure. The achievement of a common system for accounting and reporting is the prerequisite for subsequent agreement to limits or curtail defense budgets. The Caribbean Basin Initiative establishes the crucial bond between economic development and economic freedom. It can be a model for fair and productive co-operation between economies vastly different in size and character; and the diplomatic way is open to build stability and progress in southern Africa through inde¬pendence for Namibia under internationally accept-able terms. 252. Realism and a readiness to work long and hard for fair and freely agreed solutions—that is our recipe for optimism. That is the message and the offer which my Government brings to the Assembly today. 253. I began my remarks here today with an informal personal word. May I end in the same spirit? We must be determined and confident. We must be prepared for trouble, but always optimistic. In that way the vast bounties produced by the human mind and imagination can be shared by all the races and nations we represent here in this Hall. 254. A predecessor of mine as Secretary of State, whose portrait hangs in my office, conveyed the essence of America's approach to the world's dangers and dilemmas. He said we would act with a stout heart and a clear conscience and never despair . That is what John Quincy Adams said nearly a century and a half ago. I give the Assembly my personal pledge today that we will continue in that spirit, with that determination, and with that confidence in the future.